View Single Post
Originally Posted by Fuckyouformakingmeregister View Post
Do you folks really believe there is gigantic conspiracy among scientists?

You mean the fabled "consensus"?

List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming

U.S. Senate Report: Over 400 Prominent Scientists Disputed Man-Made Global Warming Claims in 2007
Senate Report Debunks "Consensus"
Report Released on December 20, 2007
U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Committee (Minority)

There Is No 'Consensus' On Global Warming

John McLean, a climate data analyst based in Melbourne, Australia and Tom Harris, the Ottawa, Canada based Executive Director of the Natural Resources Stewardship Project, researched the inside story of the IPCC and
wrote about it in the Canada Free Press.

They tell us the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is actually divided into three working groups. Only one of those groups, Working Group I (WG I) is assigned to report on the extent and possible causes of past climate change as well as future projections. Within that group they determined how many scientists really did agree with the most important IPCC conclusion, namely that humans are causing significant
climate change--in other words the key parts of WG I. According to them, in total, only 62 scientists reviewed the chapter in which this statement appears, the critical chapter. And of the 62 expert reviewers of this chapter, 55 had serious vested interest, leaving only seven expert reviewers who appear impartial.
That is a very long way from the "consensus of 2,500 scientists" that is constantly reported.

The proof is obvious, in that, there are many many scientists that say "man-made" global warming is nothing more than natural climate change.
Old 03-21-2008, 11:02 AM Badger_sly is offline  
Reply With Quote