View Single Post
ephekt
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuckyouformakingmeregister View Post
Temperatures dropping in 1 year (even 5 years) doesn't disprove global warming. It's the long term trends, not the short term variations that are important. Like this:


Source: http://www.ipcc.ch/graphics/gr-ar4-wg1.htm

I'm sure if you morons had been around in the early 1980s during the brief dip you'd all be saying the same shit. And you'd have been wrong.
The IPCC is hardly a credible source since they were caught fudging their data. Additionally, refrencing the IPCC when they have completely failed to prove that human activities are causing global warming is beyond stupid.

http://my.telegraph.co.uk/reasonmclu...level_data.htm
http://newsbusters.org/node/13698
http://rankexploits.com/musings/2008...th-noisy-data/

In fact, warming pundits (I'd hardly call these guys scientists) have been falsifying data for a long, long time.

" In order to get their models to produce predictions that are close to their designers’ expectations, modelers resort to “flux adjustments” that can be 25 times larger than the effect of doubling carbon dioxide concentrations, the supposed trigger for global warming. Richard A. Kerr, a writer for Science, says “climate modelers have been ‘cheating’ for so long it’s almost become respectable.”


Also, satellite readings of the lower troposphere (an area warming pundits agree should show evidence of warming if it existed) showing no evidence of warming, and nearly every single warming prediction is based on computer modeling rather than historical data.

Last edited by ephekt; 03-28-2008 at 11:52 PM..
Old 03-28-2008, 11:41 PM ephekt is offline  
Reply With Quote
#166  

Advertisement [Remove Advertisement]