![]() |
|
|
It's entertaining watching people who are obsessed with a single variable try to argue a gigantic multi-variate system.
|
![]() ![]() |
#211
|
Advertisement | [Remove Advertisement] |
|
|
Quote:
![]() Badger, on the other hand, really does appear to be trying his best to maintain a coherent stream of thought. Poor guy ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
#212
|
|
Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And seriously, just quit trying with the examples and analogies. You're obviously too much of a simpleton to grasp the concepts of their use. It's like the chewbacca defense, only worse. ![]() |
||||||
![]() ![]() |
#213
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() |
#214
|
|
Quote:
Poor little leo. Those pissy Cheerios must taste like crap, huh? ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
#215
|
wall candy eating retard
|
Quote:
Since the analogy wasn't terrible and showed why your logic was flawed you're wrong. I gave you follow up and explained why the analogy was logical. I even gave you another analogy. You seem to be confusing your inability to think logically with me giving up. Quote:
Quote:
I'll try to break it down for you again: a) Suppose a volcano subtracts -100 units of temperature Suppose CO2 adds +2 units of temperature b Suppose in the past: Volcano + CO2 = -98 units of temperature Suppose now: No volcano + CO2 = +2 units of temperature c) Suppose someone else didn't know a). Would they be right in concluding that CO2 doesn't add to the temperature? Obviously, no. Quote:
Last edited by Fuckyouformakingmeregister; 04-02-2008 at 03:09 PM.. |
||||
![]() ![]() |
#216
|
wall candy eating retard
|
Quote:
You showed a graph showing no warming in the past 10 years. That does not disprove an overall trend of warming over a longer period. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And it still baffles me why you trust their opinion over other climatologists. Unless of course you've decided things in advance. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||||||
![]() ![]() |
#217
|
wall candy eating retard
|
Incidentally, I spent some more time looking through that icecap.us site you fellas seems to love so much and look what I found in their about page:
Quote:
Game and match. |
|
![]() ![]() |
#218
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() |
||||||
![]() ![]() |
#219
|
|
Quote:
Think before you post. Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||||||||
![]() ![]() |
#220
|
|
Quote:
And they go on to say (which you conveniently didn't post): Quote:
Quote:
![]() |
|||
![]() ![]() |
#221
|
wall candy eating retard
|
Your logic has actually been disproven. Check again.
Quote:
For the last fucking time. The existence of natural effects that cause climate change does not actually disprove that CO2 can have an effect. Just like how the fact that lighting can cause forest fires doesn't disprove that humans can't cause forest fires. Quote:
Quote:
Says the simpleton riding the anti-global warming bandwagon. |
|||
![]() ![]() |
#222
|
wall candy eating retard
|
Quote:
You realize you just admitted that there is warming in the same sentence you deny it. Anyway, in the past 50 years the ocean has warmed. That's a fact not superseded by the data showing that oceans have cooled in the past 10 years, because, SURPRISE SURPRISE, the 50 year graph INCLUDES the data from the past 10 years. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And the main category reads: Quote:
Also, even if they did all doubt human influence, 38 is not especially significant. Quote:
It's also funny that you think you think a Senate report actually means they support the scientists. It's a fucking report, not a grant. The US government has a position and I'll give you a hint, it's not yours. Quote:
|
|||||||||
![]() ![]() |
#223
|
|
So what happens when they prove that CO2 leads to a drop in temperature because it induces plant growth?
|
![]() ![]() |
#224
|
wall candy eating retard
|
Quote:
I suppose IF they proved that we'd need to reevaluate our conclusions. But they haven't. Even if they proved the lesser claim, that CO2 induced plant growth, and plant growth on its own led to cooling, you'd still be unable to deny that CO2 contributes to warming. That's because the net effect of CO2 could be still be towards warming: e.g.: Suppose -CO2 adds 2 units to temperature and creates 1 plant -1 plant reduces temperature by 1 unit Therefore -Net effect of CO2 is 1 unit to temperature. |
|
![]() ![]() |
#225
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|