General [M]ayhem

Go Back   General [M]ayhem > Real Time Sub-Forums > The Pit
Register Members List Mark Forums Read [M]erchandise Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Free_Willy
 
Free_Willy's Avatar
 
Sailing Toward a Storm in China: U.S. Maneuvers Could Spark a War

Sailing Toward a Storm in China: U.S. Maneuvers Could Spark a War

Quietly and with minimal coverage in the U.S. press, the Navy announced that from mid-July through August it would hold exercises dubbed Operation Summer Pulse '04 in waters off the China coast near Taiwan.

This will be the first time in U.S. naval history that seven of our 12 carrier strike groups deploy in one place at the same time. It will look like the peacetime equivalent of the Normandy landings and may well end in a disaster.

At a minimum, a single carrier strike group includes the aircraft carrier itself (usually with nine or 10 squadrons and a total of about 85 aircraft), a guided missile cruiser, two guided missile destroyers, an attack submarine and a combination ammunition, oiler and supply ship.

Normally, the United States uses only one or at the most two carrier strike groups to show the flag in a trouble spot. In a combat situation it might deploy three or four, as it did for both wars with Iraq. Seven in one place is unheard of.

Operation Summer Pulse '04 was almost surely dreamed up at the Pearl Harbor headquarters of the U.S. Pacific Command and its commander, Adm. Thomas B. Fargo, and endorsed by neocons in the Pentagon. It is doubtful that Congress was consulted. This only goes to show that our foreign policy is increasingly made by the Pentagon.

According to Chinese reports, Taiwanese ships will join the seven carriers being assembled in this modern rerun of 19th century gunboat diplomacy. The ostensible reason given by the Navy for this exercise is to demonstrate the ability to concentrate massive forces in an emergency, but the focus on China in a U.S. election year sounds like a last hurrah of the neocons.

Needless to say, the Chinese are not amused. They say that their naval and air forces, plus their land-based rockets, are capable of taking on one or two carrier strike groups but that combat with seven would overwhelm them. So even before a carrier reaches the Taiwan Strait, Beijing has announced it will embark on a crash project that will enable it to meet and defeat seven U.S. carrier strike groups within a decade. There's every chance the Chinese will succeed if they are not overtaken by war first.

China is easily the fastest-growing big economy in the world, with a growth rate of 9.1% last year. On June 28, the BBC reported that China had passed the U.S. as the world's biggest recipient of foreign direct investment. China attracted $53 billion worth of new factories in 2003, whereas the U.S. took in only $40 billion; India, $4 billion; and Russia, a measly $1 billion.

If left alone by U.S. militarists, China will almost surely, over time, become a democracy on the same pattern as that of South Korea and Taiwan (both of which had U.S.-sponsored military dictatorships until the late 1980s). But a strong mainland makes the anti-China lobby in the United States very nervous. It won't give up its decades-old animosity toward Beijing and jumps at any opportunity to stir up trouble "defending Taiwan" is just a convenient cover story.

These ideologues appear to be trying to precipitate a confrontation with China while they still have the chance. Today, they happen to have rabidly anti-Chinese governments in Taipei and Tokyo as allies, but these governments don't have the popular support of their own citizens.

If American militarists are successful in sparking a war, the results are all too predictable: We will halt China's march away from communism and militarize its leadership, bankrupt ourselves, split Japan over whether to renew aggression against China and lose the war. We also will earn the lasting enmity of the most populous nation on Earth.

Chalmers Johnson's latest book is "The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic" (Metropolitan, 2004).

Copyright 2004 Los Angeles Times
__________________
"It's a jungle here--right now we're advising our clients to put all they can into canned goods and shotguns!"

--- Brain Gremlin in the movie Gremlins II: The New Batch.

Discordian Resistance Front, Co. A, Semi-Conscious Liberation Army.
Old 07-18-2004, 11:11 PM Free_Willy is offline  
Reply With Quote
#1  

Advertisement [Remove Advertisement]

ViriiK
http://military.revenanteagle.org/
 
ViriiK's Avatar
 
Written by LA Times.. Glad to see they're reliable.. He must be a chomsky fan..
__________________
- [M]ayhem Gun Club
- [M]ilitary [M]ayhem Club
- Secretary of Defense for the PopeKevinI Administration
- Proud Sponsor of the American Military-Industrial Complex
Old 07-18-2004, 11:12 PM ViriiK is offline  
Reply With Quote
#2  

TheMorlock
Contrary to my previous title I never fucked Inf's mother
 
TheMorlock's Avatar
 
Yes free willy makes another useless post
You suck at the interweb
__________________
There is nothing to worry about. Legions of wise people with nothing but all of best interests at heart are ensuring our future of love and infinite bliss. Go watch TV :Bflaps
http://www.genmay.com/showthread.php?t=572323
Old 07-18-2004, 11:14 PM TheMorlock is offline  
Reply With Quote
#3  

Free_Willy
 
Free_Willy's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ViriiK
Written by LA Times.. Glad to see they're reliable.. He must be a chomsky fan..
WTF are you talking about you retard? this is one, researchable, and two LA times is a mainstream reputable news organisation!
__________________
"It's a jungle here--right now we're advising our clients to put all they can into canned goods and shotguns!"

--- Brain Gremlin in the movie Gremlins II: The New Batch.

Discordian Resistance Front, Co. A, Semi-Conscious Liberation Army.
Old 07-18-2004, 11:22 PM Free_Willy is offline  
Reply With Quote
#4  

Christian Shock-Treatment
RUN NIGGA RUN!
 
Christian Shock-Treatment's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Free_Willy
WTF are you talking about you retard? this is one, researchable, and two LA times is a mainstream reputable news organisation!

**organization.
Old 07-18-2004, 11:25 PM Christian Shock-Treatment is offline  
Reply With Quote
#5  

TheMorlock
Contrary to my previous title I never fucked Inf's mother
 
TheMorlock's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Shock
**organization.
don't pick on his lack of a dick

ooppps I mean dictionary(not really)
__________________
There is nothing to worry about. Legions of wise people with nothing but all of best interests at heart are ensuring our future of love and infinite bliss. Go watch TV :Bflaps
http://www.genmay.com/showthread.php?t=572323
Old 07-18-2004, 11:26 PM TheMorlock is offline  
Reply With Quote
#6  

ieyeasu
 
ieyeasu's Avatar
 
Yeah...blown way out of proportion.
__________________
www.pizzasaucerecipe.org
Old 07-18-2004, 11:28 PM ieyeasu is offline  
Reply With Quote
#7  

Free_Willy
 
Free_Willy's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ieyeasu
Yeah...blown way out of proportion.
honestly, how would 7 carrier battle groups off your coast making you nervous "blown out of proportion"??? Wars have been started for far less!
__________________
"It's a jungle here--right now we're advising our clients to put all they can into canned goods and shotguns!"

--- Brain Gremlin in the movie Gremlins II: The New Batch.

Discordian Resistance Front, Co. A, Semi-Conscious Liberation Army.
Old 07-18-2004, 11:29 PM Free_Willy is offline  
Reply With Quote
#8  

Magik Smoke
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Free_Willy
WTF are you talking about you retard? this is one, researchable, and two LA times is a mainstream reputable news organisation!

Im sure he intended it as a compliment. Chomsky is a brilliant guy.



Snicker chortle scoff
__________________
"There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: the fashionable non-conformist."
Old 07-18-2004, 11:32 PM Magik Smoke is offline  
Reply With Quote
#9  

ieyeasu
 
ieyeasu's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Free_Willy
honestly, how would 7 carrier battle groups off your coast making you nervous "blown out of proportion"??? Wars have been started for far less!

It's a maneouvre. We held them all the time during the Cold War right on the curtain; we've held them in SK; it's SOP for armed forces in a possible theatre.

It's overblown. Will the Chinese look at us more closely during the maneouvre? Yes; they should, that's their job. But seeing as how a defacto (and rather cozy) "cold war" of minimal proportions exists between the two nations, it's what we call "no BFD".
__________________
www.pizzasaucerecipe.org
Old 07-18-2004, 11:32 PM ieyeasu is offline  
Reply With Quote
#10  

TheMorlock
Contrary to my previous title I never fucked Inf's mother
 
TheMorlock's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ieyeasu
It's a maneouvre. We held them all the time during the Cold War right on the curtain; we've held them in SK; it's SOP for armed forces in a possible theatre.

It's overblown. Will the Chinese look at us more closely during the maneouvre? Yes; they should, that's their job. But seeing as how a defacto (and rather cozy) "cold war" of minimal proportions exists between the two nations, it's what we call "no BFD".

Are you really that stupid??

Trying to impart a clue to someone who has proven over the last week+ to be Warrantied to be clueless?
__________________
There is nothing to worry about. Legions of wise people with nothing but all of best interests at heart are ensuring our future of love and infinite bliss. Go watch TV :Bflaps
http://www.genmay.com/showthread.php?t=572323
Old 07-18-2004, 11:35 PM TheMorlock is offline  
Reply With Quote
#11  

ieyeasu
 
ieyeasu's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMorlock
Are you really that stupid??

Trying to impart a clue to someone who has proven over the last week+ to be Warrantied to be clueless?

Yes.
__________________
www.pizzasaucerecipe.org
Old 07-18-2004, 11:37 PM ieyeasu is offline  
Reply With Quote
#12  

TheMorlock
Contrary to my previous title I never fucked Inf's mother
 
TheMorlock's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ieyeasu
Yes.

No fair you read the hidden text!!!
BASTARD
__________________
There is nothing to worry about. Legions of wise people with nothing but all of best interests at heart are ensuring our future of love and infinite bliss. Go watch TV :Bflaps
http://www.genmay.com/showthread.php?t=572323
Old 07-18-2004, 11:46 PM TheMorlock is offline  
Reply With Quote
#13  

ViriiK
http://military.revenanteagle.org/
 
ViriiK's Avatar
 
It's called International Waters.. The military has the rights to do that.. Especially with Taiwan granting them the authorization to do in their own waters...

And this chomsky is blown out of proportion..
__________________
- [M]ayhem Gun Club
- [M]ilitary [M]ayhem Club
- Secretary of Defense for the PopeKevinI Administration
- Proud Sponsor of the American Military-Industrial Complex
Old 07-19-2004, 12:28 AM ViriiK is offline  
Reply With Quote
#14  

ApathyEcstasy
yeah, different species of slanteye here
 
ApathyEcstasy's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Free_Willy
Sailing Toward a Storm in China: U.S. Maneuvers Could Spark a War

Quietly and with minimal coverage in the U.S. press, the Navy announced that from mid-July through August it would hold exercises dubbed Operation Summer Pulse '04 in waters off the China coast near Taiwan.

This will be the first time in U.S. naval history that seven of our 12 carrier strike groups deploy in one place at the same time. It will look like the peacetime equivalent of the Normandy landings and may well end in a disaster.

At a minimum, a single carrier strike group includes the aircraft carrier itself (usually with nine or 10 squadrons and a total of about 85 aircraft), a guided missile cruiser, two guided missile destroyers, an attack submarine and a combination ammunition, oiler and supply ship.

Normally, the United States uses only one or at the most two carrier strike groups to show the flag in a trouble spot. In a combat situation it might deploy three or four, as it did for both wars with Iraq. Seven in one place is unheard of.

Operation Summer Pulse '04 was almost surely dreamed up at the Pearl Harbor headquarters of the U.S. Pacific Command and its commander, Adm. Thomas B. Fargo, and endorsed by neocons in the Pentagon. It is doubtful that Congress was consulted. This only goes to show that our foreign policy is increasingly made by the Pentagon.

According to Chinese reports, Taiwanese ships will join the seven carriers being assembled in this modern rerun of 19th century gunboat diplomacy. The ostensible reason given by the Navy for this exercise is to demonstrate the ability to concentrate massive forces in an emergency, but the focus on China in a U.S. election year sounds like a last hurrah of the neocons.

Needless to say, the Chinese are not amused. They say that their naval and air forces, plus their land-based rockets, are capable of taking on one or two carrier strike groups but that combat with seven would overwhelm them. So even before a carrier reaches the Taiwan Strait, Beijing has announced it will embark on a crash project that will enable it to meet and defeat seven U.S. carrier strike groups within a decade. There's every chance the Chinese will succeed if they are not overtaken by war first.

China is easily the fastest-growing big economy in the world, with a growth rate of 9.1% last year. On June 28, the BBC reported that China had passed the U.S. as the world's biggest recipient of foreign direct investment. China attracted $53 billion worth of new factories in 2003, whereas the U.S. took in only $40 billion; India, $4 billion; and Russia, a measly $1 billion.

If left alone by U.S. militarists, China will almost surely, over time, become a democracy on the same pattern as that of South Korea and Taiwan (both of which had U.S.-sponsored military dictatorships until the late 1980s). But a strong mainland makes the anti-China lobby in the United States very nervous. It won't give up its decades-old animosity toward Beijing and jumps at any opportunity to stir up trouble "defending Taiwan" is just a convenient cover story.

These ideologues appear to be trying to precipitate a confrontation with China while they still have the chance. Today, they happen to have rabidly anti-Chinese governments in Taipei and Tokyo as allies, but these governments don't have the popular support of their own citizens.

If American militarists are successful in sparking a war, the results are all too predictable: We will halt China's march away from communism and militarize its leadership, bankrupt ourselves, split Japan over whether to renew aggression against China and lose the war. We also will earn the lasting enmity of the most populous nation on Earth.

Chalmers Johnson's latest book is "The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic" (Metropolitan, 2004).

Copyright 2004 Los Angeles Times

*cough* yeah thanks for including your own comments..
__________________
7.9%, Chinese growth has screeched to a halt! People
are going to riot in the streets! The CCP is about to
fall!
8.1%, Chinese growth has over-heated! People are
going to riot in the streets! The CCP is about to fall!
Old 07-19-2004, 04:50 AM ApathyEcstasy is offline  
Reply With Quote
#15  

Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:13 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.