![]() |
|
Contrary to my previous title I never fucked Inf's mother
|
Quote:
You handled every argument? You cant even read half of them correctly ![]()
__________________
There is nothing to worry about. Legions of wise people with nothing but all of best interests at heart are ensuring our future of love and infinite bliss. Go watch TV :Bflaps http://www.genmay.com/showthread.php?t=572323 |
|
![]() ![]() |
#196
|
Advertisement | [Remove Advertisement] |
|
|
OK......
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() Given your attempted analogy is pretty stupid, and you completely failed to show a correlation, it's obvious you not only suck at analogies, but you're not really trying to disprove what I've proven to you. So we'll chalk it up as you don't have an arguement. ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
#197
|
|
My first post on page 3. My first and second post on page 7. My first post on page 8. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
![]() ![]() |
#198
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
#199
|
wall candy eating retard
|
Quote:
The point of the analogy was to show how ridiculous your logic is. You can't go from the statement "that the earth was warmer in the past" to the statement "thus man-made global warming doesn't occur". It doesn't follow logically. |
|
![]() ![]() |
#200
|
wall candy eating retard
|
The one witha graph showing how temperatures fluctuated in the past. Yes, I saw it. It doesn't disprove that CO2 could contribute to warming now. Quote:
Your second post was about how there was no consensus in the scientific community and you went on to link the wikipedia page which actually disproved your own point. To refresh your memory, the link said that list included people who believed that CO2 was having an effect, they simply disagreed about how much of an effect and/or what could be done about it. Not to mention that that list was already quite short and included a lot of quacks. Quote:
Since I did answer his question (a "yes" is an answer whether you think it is or not) and since the link only dealt with data from 2003 on compared to my graph which dealt with 1950 on (and included "your data"), you were again proved wrong. Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
![]() ![]() |
#201
|
wall candy eating retard
|
|
![]() ![]() |
#202
|
I THOUGHT GOOGLE IS WHAT MY FATHER DOES TO ME EVERY NIGHT!
|
Reading through the morlock's posts in this thread makes me think he is probably going to hit breaking point soon, I'm hoping for some sort of suicide *fingers crossed*
|
![]() ![]() |
#203
|
Contrary to my previous title I never fucked Inf's mother
|
__________________
There is nothing to worry about. Legions of wise people with nothing but all of best interests at heart are ensuring our future of love and infinite bliss. Go watch TV :Bflaps http://www.genmay.com/showthread.php?t=572323 |
![]() ![]() |
#204
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
![]() ![]() |
||
![]() ![]() |
#205
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Quote:
A) Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() So, yeah..... we'll let you sit in the corner with your dunce cap on for a while. ![]() Oh, and those are just the first link showing 38. How did you ever manage to "overlook" my other link proving 400 more scientists say man-made global warming is ![]() Quote:
Hmmm? ![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
|
||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() |
#206
|
wall candy eating retard
|
Quote:
Since my analogy represents your logic and shows how it, applied to forest fires, can reach ridiculous conclusions, your logic has actually been disproven. Quote:
Since you seem to have difficulty grasping basic logic, I'll throw a fictional example your way: Suppose the earth was close to the sun 10,000,000 years ago and had zero CO2 in the atmosphere. Suppose in the present the earth is far from the sun and has eleventy-billion units of CO2 in the atmosphere. If the earth is colder in the present than it was in the past, can you conclude CO2 has no effect on temperature? The answer, of course, is no. The conditions on earth weren't the same now as they were then, so CO2 as a causal mechanism has not been ruled out. |
||
![]() ![]() |
#207
|
wall candy eating retard
|
Quote:
See previous post for why your logic doesn't work. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
If you want to now amend your position to say that CO2 has a minor effect, go right ahead. Quote:
Your "proof", for the 5th or 6th time now, is over a 10 year period whereas mine is over a 50 year period. Mine shows an overall increase in temperature over that amount of time. So when asked "has the earth warmed in the past 50 years?" my graph actually answers that question. At best, your graph answers the question "has the earth warmed in the past 10 years". Quote:
|
||||||||||
![]() ![]() |
#208
|
Contrary to my previous title I never fucked Inf's mother
|
Quote:
I know your reading comprehension is not all that great but now you seem to be completely braindead.
__________________
There is nothing to worry about. Legions of wise people with nothing but all of best interests at heart are ensuring our future of love and infinite bliss. Go watch TV :Bflaps http://www.genmay.com/showthread.php?t=572323 |
|
![]() ![]() |
#209
|
wall candy eating retard
|
Quote:
Do you really have that much difficulty grasping basic logic or do you just have some obsession with having the last word, no matter how wrong you are? Fact is, you cannot rule out CO2 as a cause of warming simply because temperatures happened to drop in the past while CO2 remained high. Something else, like increased volcanic activity, could have made things cooler back then. And you can use the same logic for past increases in temperatures sans CO2. Try not to hurt yourself when you realize I'm right. P.S. And I'll be happy to accept an avatar from you too - my title is getting lonely all by itself. ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
#210
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|