Michael Brown: Ferguson, Missouri

[SamFarber]

Originally Posted by Killer_B

Some food for thought, seriously...

So weird that like zero of the rifle-toting patriots who were drawing beads on federal officers at the Bundy ranch have loaded up their arsenals and headed to Ferguson to get the backs of people who are feeling some actual tyranny.

What's the difference? So weird.

Big difference. They were opposing looting, not supporting it.

[SamFarber]

Originally Posted by Killer_B

Samuel.

Is your cock ready to spew or something?

Jesus.

[BlisterDick]

"The only good niqqer is a dead niqqer."
-SamFarber ©1942-2014

[Baloneyflaps.]

POLICE SHOT AN UNARMED TEENAGER

[mikeawesome]

thats not a gun in the 3rd frame in the pic above?

[Baloneyflaps.]

he was a sweet young man just trying to visit his grandmother

[pyramid]

Originally Posted by mikeawesome

thats not a gun in the 3rd frame in the pic above?

the box of cigars he was stealing...

[BlisterDick]

YOUR MOM WAS A SWEET YOUNG MAN

[pyramid]

Originally Posted by Baloneyflaps

he was a sweet young man just trying to visit his grandmother

My, what big riots you have...

All the better for race baiters to leech off of...

[Baloneyflaps.]

now the darkies are looting the store that he robbed... because you know, it's THE STORES FAULT THAT HE ROBBED IT!






maybe they're just mad at the store for having security cameras because it totally fucks up their "sweet unarmed innocent teenager angel" narrrative

[RazorWind]

Originally Posted by Killer_B

Some food for thought, seriously...

So weird that like zero of the rifle-toting patriots who were drawing beads on federal officers at the Bundy ranch have loaded up their arsenals and headed to Ferguson to get the backs of people who are feeling some actual tyranny.

What's the difference? So weird.

The difference in this case is two things:

1. The folks being oppressed in this case are generally black, urban dwellers. These people are the antithesis of the rifle toting Oath Keeper demographic, which is like 100% white rednecks who don't live within in an incorporated place. Their solution to the tyranny of a municipality is to just not live in one, and they feel a very limited degree of sympathy for people whose lifestyle doesn't look like their own.

2. The Oath Keepers and their fellow gun toting zealots know that they would be fighting at a severe disadvantage against a modern militarized police force, which is better equipped and has greater numbers, even if it doesn't necessarily have the advantage of better training in urban combat.

[SamFarber]

Originally Posted by RazorWind

The difference in this case is two things:

1. The folks being oppressed in this case are generally black, urban dwellers. These people are the antithesis of the rifle toting Oath Keeper demographic, which is like 100% white rednecks who don't live within in an incorporated place. Their solution to the tyranny of a municipality is to just not live in one, and they feel a very limited degree of sympathy for people whose lifestyle doesn't look like their own.

2. The Oath Keepers and their fellow gun toting zealots know that they would be fighting at a severe disadvantage against a modern militarized police force, which is better equipped and has greater numbers, even if it doesn't necessarily have the advantage of better training in urban combat.

1. How are they being "oppressed"? Having to actually PAY for things? In the already underpowered mind of a Negro I'm sure getting free things all the time make them expect they never have to pay for anything - even with welfare money.

[lollersk8s]