General [M]ayhem

Go Back   General [M]ayhem > Real Time Sub-Forums > The Pit
Register Members List Mark Forums Read [M]erchandise Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Fuckyouformakingmeregister
wall candy eating retard
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMorlock View Post
You really don't understand this shit do you?

Are you sure you want to throw yourself in with Badger?
Old 05-09-2008, 11:42 AM Fuckyouformakingmeregister is offline  
Reply With Quote
#421  

Advertisement [Remove Advertisement]

TheMorlock
Contrary to my previous title I never fucked Inf's mother
 
TheMorlock's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuckyouformakingmeregister View Post
Are you sure you want to throw yourself in with Badger?

Are you sure you don't know shit?
__________________
There is nothing to worry about. Legions of wise people with nothing but all of best interests at heart are ensuring our future of love and infinite bliss. Go watch TV :Bflaps
http://www.genmay.com/showthread.php?t=572323
Old 05-09-2008, 11:47 AM TheMorlock is offline  
Reply With Quote
#422  

Badger_sly
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuckyouformakingmeregister View Post
Your inane arguments aside, I'm puzzled as to why you're supporting Badger.
He knows that the goofy fad, you're part of and preaching, is really just natural climate change, as has been proven in this thread and other "man-made gw" threads like it.



Quote:
because all Badger can seem to do is
... prove you wrong and wait for you to come up with a new point.
Old 05-09-2008, 01:37 PM Badger_sly is offline  
Reply With Quote
#423  

BigFuzzyArchon
 
 
Old 05-09-2008, 02:05 PM BigFuzzyArchon is offline  
Reply With Quote
#424  

Fuckyouformakingmeregister
wall candy eating retard
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigFuzzyArchon View Post

Quote:
This is showing us that, over the past century, most of Antarctica has not undergone the fairly dramatic warming that has affected the rest of the globe.
Quote:
The error appeared to be caused by models overestimating the amount of water vapor in the Antarctic atmosphere, the new study concludes. The reason may have to do with the cold Antarctic atmosphere handling moisture differently than the atmosphere over warmer regions.
Your article suggests that climate estimates for the Antarctic and only the Antarctic might be flawed.

Such a thing, if it were true, would not invalidate the conclusions that humans have had an effect on climate. At best, it would mean that the effects of climate change would get more serious a little later down the line than previously thought.
Old 05-09-2008, 05:18 PM Fuckyouformakingmeregister is offline  
Reply With Quote
#425  

TheMorlock
Contrary to my previous title I never fucked Inf's mother
 
TheMorlock's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuckyouformakingmeregister View Post
Your article suggests that climate estimates for the Antarctic and only the Antarctic might be flawed.

Such a thing, if it were true, would not invalidate the conclusions that humans have had an effect on climate. At best, it would mean that the effects of climate change would get more serious a little later down the line than previously thought.

and previous articles show that estimates for all areas are flawed

Just put your fingers back in your ears and the blindfold back on and bang on the keyboard with your nose some more. It's not as entertaining as it was pages and pages ago but it's free so I can't complain too much.

How's that 5C coming?
__________________
There is nothing to worry about. Legions of wise people with nothing but all of best interests at heart are ensuring our future of love and infinite bliss. Go watch TV :Bflaps
http://www.genmay.com/showthread.php?t=572323
Old 05-09-2008, 05:57 PM TheMorlock is offline  
Reply With Quote
#426  

ephekt
 
The IPCC falsified data; this is a fact. They also failed to show that warming is caused by man.

You warming evangelists still cannot show a cause and effect relationship between warming and human activity. You're going to continue being mocked by anyone with a slight bit of intelligence until you can. s

AGW is junk/pop science that the dishonest left has latched onto in order to herd in inane like carbon trading.

Last edited by ephekt; 05-11-2008 at 08:41 PM..
Old 05-11-2008, 08:38 PM ephekt is offline  
Reply With Quote
#427  

Fuckyouformakingmeregister
wall candy eating retard
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ephekt View Post
The IPCC falsified data; this is a fact.

Prove it without quoting that quack Nils-Axel Morner, an article about him, or a certain opinion piece (by an economist who still believes warming is human caused).

Quote:
They also failed to show that warming is caused by man.
You can't just make blanket statements like that. Have you actually read the report? It evaluated potential natural causes for global warming, found them wanting, while at the same time finding a strong relationship between temperature rise and human activity. What elements of the report do you have a problem with? Do you, for example, disagree with their dismissal of solar radiation as a cause (which I briefly outlined earlier in the thread)? If so, why?

Quote:
You warming evangelists still cannot show a cause and effect relationship between warming and human activity. You're going to continue being mocked by anyone with a slight bit of intelligence until you can. s
What sort of evidence are you looking for? It's a fact that CO2 is a greenhouse gas. It's a fact that humans can produce it. It's a fact that temperatures have increased alongside an increase in human carbon-producing activities. When factors other than CO2 are controlled, temperatures are still seen as rising. The relevant rise in CO2 preceded the relevant temperature rise. Are there other sorts of things you want to see before causation conclusions are made? If so, what?
Old 05-11-2008, 10:50 PM Fuckyouformakingmeregister is offline  
Reply With Quote
#428  

Badger_sly
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigFuzzyArchon View Post

That and all the other links of proof of corrupt / false data by the IPCC that has been provided numberous times in this thread.
Old 05-12-2008, 01:51 PM Badger_sly is offline  
Reply With Quote
#429  

Supafly TNT
 
The UN is trying to use the lie that human beings are causing global warming to institute a global carbon tax. thats where all that BS comes from.
Old 05-12-2008, 02:18 PM Supafly TNT is offline  
Reply With Quote
#430  

Badger_sly
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ephekt View Post
The IPCC falsified data; this is a fact. They also failed to show that warming is caused by man.

You warming evangelists still cannot show a cause and effect relationship between warming and human activity. You're going to continue being mocked by anyone with a slight bit of intelligence until you can. s

AGW is junk/pop science that the dishonest left has latched onto in order to herd in inane like carbon trading.

Fuckyouformakingmeregister knows all of that since about page 15. He's just been acting like an idiot.
Old 05-12-2008, 02:28 PM Badger_sly is offline  
Reply With Quote
#431  

Fuckyouformakingmeregister
wall candy eating retard
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Supafly TNT View Post
The UN is trying to use the lie that human beings are causing global warming to institute a global carbon tax. thats where all that BS comes from.

And why would the scientists that participated in the IPCC want this? Are they getting a cut?

And for the record, I don't support a carbon tax. Just because you believe the scientific community about global warming doesn't mean you buy into the "solution(s)".
Old 05-12-2008, 02:51 PM Fuckyouformakingmeregister is offline  
Reply With Quote
#432  

Supafly TNT
 
you gotta look into who funds these studies. 2 scientists could come up with totally different conclusions based on whos providing the grant for the study. independent scientists within NASA claim that the Sun is the cause for the global warming as it is getting hotter. Furthermore fluctuations in the temperature of the earth have existed far before the the industrial revolution came about. The UN wishes to cash in on the times and creates its own studies, one must be very wary where the funding for the study is coming from.
Old 05-12-2008, 03:18 PM Supafly TNT is offline  
Reply With Quote
#433  

ephekt
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuckyouformakingmeregister View Post
And why would the scientists that participated in the IPCC want this? Are they getting a cut?

And for the record, I don't support a carbon tax. Just because you believe the scientific community about global warming doesn't mean you buy into the "solution(s)".
Gore certainly stands to make millions. The scientists probably have grant money up for grabs as well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Supafly TNT View Post
you gotta look into who funds these studies. 2 scientists could come up with totally different conclusions based on whos providing the grant for the study. independent scientists within NASA claim that the Sun is the cause for the global warming as it is getting hotter. Furthermore fluctuations in the temperature of the earth have existed far before the the industrial revolution came about. The UN wishes to cash in on the times and creates its own studies, one must be very wary where the funding for the study is coming from.
Indeed. There is plenty of correlation between Co2 levels and warming, but no causation. The evangelists would have us take their extrapolations and computer models (rather than historical temperature records) as fact, which is pure BS.

Last edited by ephekt; 05-12-2008 at 03:33 PM..
Old 05-12-2008, 03:30 PM ephekt is offline  
Reply With Quote
#434  

Fuckyouformakingmeregister
wall candy eating retard
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Supafly TNT View Post
you gotta look into who funds these studies. 2 scientists could come up with totally different conclusions based on whos providing the grant for the study. independent scientists within NASA claim that the Sun is the cause for the global warming as it is getting hotter.

Most research is funded by the government in some way, including that of your NASA scientists. Please link their study, as I'm anxious to know what they have to say. The increased warming at higher latitudes relative to lower latitudes plus the increase in warmer nights mentioned by the IPCC sounds like pretty good evidence to me that the sun isn't playing a big role in the observed warming, but maybe they've stumbled onto something which has been buried by the gigantic science conspiracy.

Quote:
Furthermore fluctuations in the temperature of the earth have existed far before the the industrial revolution came about. The UN wishes to cash in on the times and creates its own studies, one must be very wary where the funding for the study is coming from.
The fact that temperatures have fluctuated "on their own" in the past is not proof that humans have no impact on global temperature. Rather, it's proof that non-human factors can impact global temperature. And the IPCC fully admits that other factors CAN impact global temperature. After controlling such factors, however, the IPCC believes that CURRENT warming is attributable to human activity.
Old 05-12-2008, 04:50 PM Fuckyouformakingmeregister is offline  
Reply With Quote
#435  

Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:19 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.