General [M]ayhem

Go Back   General [M]ayhem > Real Time Sub-Forums > The Pit
Register Members List Mark Forums Read [M]erchandise Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Spoonie
 
Spoonie's Avatar
 
"The Non-Existence of God" by Nicholas Everitt. Great piece of philosophical writing.
Old 07-10-2005, 12:37 PM Spoonie is offline  
Reply With Quote
#136  

Advertisement [Remove Advertisement]

tenk_immortals
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by NAV man
Catch-22, Joseph Heller, WW-2

I'm serious, that's where I get my inspiration from.

It's an amazing book. But, all these books should be required reading for everyone.
Old 07-14-2005, 09:41 PM tenk_immortals is offline  
Reply With Quote
#137  

TheIlluminatedOne
 
Mystery of the Ages by Herbert W. Armstrong
Old 07-19-2005, 05:51 PM TheIlluminatedOne is offline  
Reply With Quote
#138  

Squisher
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by vect0rburn
lord of the flies - william golding - a graphical depiction of human nature in a blank society

More like an analysis of the creation of a power vacuum since most people agree that these kids were not true blank slates. They grew up in the regimented, authoritarian world of civilization


Everything for Sale by Robert Kuttner - Kuttner uses data and analysis to show that mixed markets are generally superior to unregulated ones.
How the Mind Works by Stephen Pinker - Pinker describes the "computational theory of the mind" and the evolutionary explanations for human behavior.
Wealth and Democracy by Kevin Phillips - Philips traces the fates of America's richest families from the time of the revolution to the present. He also explores the great sources of american wealth inequality.

Last edited by Squisher; 07-23-2005 at 01:46 PM..
Old 07-23-2005, 01:40 PM Squisher is offline  
Reply With Quote
#139  

ieyeasu
 
ieyeasu's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ViriiK
Dreadnought : The Coming of the Great War
]
QFMFT
__________________
www.pizzasaucerecipe.org
Old 07-23-2005, 02:47 PM ieyeasu is offline  
Reply With Quote
#140  

ManSandwichMayo
BelgianSandwich
stfu you cracka
 
I've been having trouble in finding Marx's Communist Manifesto.

Its not in my public library's database or the university's database.

Can someone help me out?
__________________
Atheocon!!!

916a9e42e7c32e2967258d5b221f5f06 [y yuo throw haet :( :(] porn may <3's yuo.
Old 08-04-2005, 11:30 PM ManSandwichMayo is offline  
Reply With Quote
#141  

Colonel Mustard
in the study, with the candlestick...
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ManSandwichMayo
I've been having trouble in finding Marx's Communist Manifesto.

Its not in my public library's database or the university's database.

Can someone help me out?

most (shorter) philosophical primary texts are widely available online.

http://www.anu.edu.au/polsci/marx/cl...manifesto.html

if you want to delve a little bit deeper into marx, it would probably be a good idea to find a copy of the marx-engels reader or a similiar compilation of works.
Old 08-10-2005, 07:00 PM Colonel Mustard is offline  
Reply With Quote
#142  

Spoonie
 
Spoonie's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ManSandwichMayo
I've been having trouble in finding Marx's Communist Manifesto.

Its not in my public library's database or the university's database.

Can someone help me out?



Are you kidding? Seems like "Communist Manifesto" has been banned from your university and your local library. Brilliant.
Old 08-11-2005, 07:10 AM Spoonie is offline  
Reply With Quote
#143  

Spoonie
 
Spoonie's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colonel Mustard
if you want to delve a little bit deeper into marx, it would probably be a good idea to find a copy of the marx-engels reader or a similiar compilation of works.

Incidentally, Engels is a vastly better writer than Marx. So you might want to read: The Condition of the Working Class in England and Socialism: Utopian and Scientific.

A good "Cliff Notes" is Terrell Carver's Engels, published by Oxford University Press.
Old 08-11-2005, 07:13 AM Spoonie is offline  
Reply With Quote
#144  

Mulan
cunning linguist
 
Mulan's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScretHate
Why would you waste your time reading those Ayn Rand books? Just read the communist manifesto and invert it. Ayn Rand is for asocial, underdeveloped, teenagers.

Ah randroids. God I hate those kids.

Nano, even though Romance (or "Epic" since it is a more apt description) of the Three Kingdoms is a great book, it is by NO means a great historical record of ancient Chinese history. It's a convoluted and contrived account of historical events and downplays the actual moral turpitude of the characters.

Regardless, Guan gong/di (Guan yi). We have a big bronze figure of him in our house and I want to learn to use the guan dow (that kickass weapon he carries) one day.
__________________
Officially intarweb married to Demosh 23.02.04
Founder and member of the [M] Cantonese (廣東話) Crew, an umbrella corporation that includes 中山, 东莞, 台山, 潮州, 客家, etc.
Proud Member of the Dschinghis Khan Club
39b56ecc24c1deef096b4f39f96d42c6

Last edited by Mulan; 08-15-2005 at 02:59 AM..
Old 08-15-2005, 02:54 AM Mulan is offline  
Reply With Quote
#145  

Spoonie
 
Spoonie's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mulan
Nano, even though Romance (or "Epic" since it is a more apt description) of the Three Kingdoms is a great book, it is by NO means a great historical record of ancient Chinese history. It's a convoluted and contrived and downplays the actual moral turpitude of the characters.

It doesn't "downplay" the "moral turpitude" of the characters. You just need to open your eyes and use your brain. Anyone who isn't a twelve year old is going to be able to work out that Liu Bei was not "the good guy". In fact, Lo Kuanchung probably deliberately wrote the book in such a "contrived", unsubtle and morally binary way to tease/confuse the readers (or to get past censors).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mulan
Regardless, Guan gong/di (Guan yi). We have a big bronze figure of him in our house and I want to learn to use the guan dow (that kickass weapon he carries) one day.

You then go on to say that you have a figure of Guan Yu (it's "Guan Yu", not "Guan Yi"). Why? He was not particularly "moral" or "heroic". It is always fascinating to see how deification is based on ignorance, and then tradition perpetuates it.
Old 08-15-2005, 03:05 AM Spoonie is offline  
Reply With Quote
#146  

Nano
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spoonie
It doesn't "downplay" the "moral turpitude" of the characters. You just need to open your eyes and use your brain. Anyone who isn't a twelve year old is going to be able to work out that Liu Bei was not "the good guy". In fact, Lo Kuanchung probably deliberately wrote the book in such a "contrived", unsubtle and morally binary way to tease/confuse the readers (or to get past censors).

Yea, it's definitely a shu-ified book, and is to be taken as an editorial more than history, but its historically based.


Quote:
You then go on to say that you have a figure of Guan Yu (it's "Guan Yu", not "Guan Yi"). Why? He was not particularly "moral" or "heroic". It is always fascinating to see how deification is based on ignorance, and then tradition perpetuates it.
He's revered there as the god of war, whatchu expect? :P

Good old lord lovely beard.
__________________
Im not elitist, Ive simply been marginalized by the preponderance of idiots in the world.
Old 08-15-2005, 07:10 AM Nano is offline  
Reply With Quote
#147  

Nano
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mulan
Nano, even though Romance (or "Epic" since it is a more apt description) of the Three Kingdoms is a great book, it is by NO means a great historical record of ancient Chinese history. It's a convoluted and contrived account of historical events and downplays the actual moral turpitude of the characters.

Yea, I know. Thats why I used representation, since its more of an editorial. I still adore the story.

Quote:
Regardless, Guan gong/di (Guan yi). We have a big bronze figure of him in our house and I want to learn to use the guan dow (that kickass weapon he carries) one day.
Yknow..if the sun clan hadn't killed him... I daresay china may have had a different history. And if Zhao Yun hadn't saved his idiot son.
__________________
Im not elitist, Ive simply been marginalized by the preponderance of idiots in the world.
Old 08-15-2005, 07:15 AM Nano is offline  
Reply With Quote
#148  

Spoonie
 
Spoonie's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nano
Yknow..if the sun clan hadn't killed him... I daresay china may have had a different history. And if Zhao Yun hadn't saved his idiot son.

There would be interesting "counterfactual history". What if Guan Yu didn't get pwned? Probably wouldn't matter much because Liu's young son was to get the throne and he would still be utterly useless regardless of Guan's presence. Any alliance with the Wu to counter the Chao's might be difficult to form. In the end, Shu would probably be isolated as ever, and with their best generals getting old (Zhang Fei, Zhao Yun, Huang Zhong) and the new ones really rather shitty (Ma Xu, for example), Zhuge Lian would still be fighting a losing battle, overrun by the massive Chao's troops.


Interesting bit from Wikipedia, BTW
Quote:
Luo Guanzhong's re-telling of this story also give us a window into the politics of his time. The contemporary Ming Emperor Wanli had officially elevated Guan Yu to the position of a god, Lord Guan, to emphasize Guan Yu's characteristics of bravery and extreme fidelity (characteristics the emperor no doubt wanted to promote in his subjects). Luo Guanzhong, however, gives us a more subtle Guan Yu who dies a shattered idol, deserving pity because of his overconfidence. This dissonance was overlooked in traditional commentaries on the text but recent research finds in Luo Guanzhong's Guan Yu a fascinating reflection of Chinese culture under Ming rule, the author complying with the program of imperial propaganda while also subtly subverting it.

Last edited by Spoonie; 08-15-2005 at 01:26 PM..
Old 08-15-2005, 01:23 PM Spoonie is offline  
Reply With Quote
#149  

Nano
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spoonie
There would be interesting "counterfactual history". What if Guan Yu didn't get pwned? Probably wouldn't matter much because Liu's young son was to get the throne and he would still be utterly useless regardless of Guan's presence. Any alliance with the Wu to counter the Chao's might be difficult to form. In the end, Shu would probably be isolated as ever, and with their best generals getting old (Zhang Fei, Zhao Yun, Huang Zhong) and the new ones really rather shitty (Ma Xu, for example), Zhuge Lian would still be fighting a losing battle, overrun by the massive Chao's troops.


Interesting bit from Wikipedia, BTW

Yea, Guan Yu underestimated pang de, lu meng and lu xun. all three strong generals. Oh.. and do you mean Cao?
__________________
Im not elitist, Ive simply been marginalized by the preponderance of idiots in the world.
Old 08-15-2005, 09:31 PM Nano is offline  
Reply With Quote
#150  

Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:22 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.