General [M]ayhem

Go Back   General [M]ayhem > Real Time Sub-Forums > The Pit
Register Members List Mark Forums Read [M]erchandise Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools
electric!sheep
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Morlock


never said it was
Ok, then what was your point?
Old 07-19-2002, 01:31 PM electric!sheep is offline  
Reply With Quote
#106  

Advertisement [Remove Advertisement]

Morlock
 
Quote:
Originally posted by electric!sheep


Ok, then what was your point?
go back and read the post I responded to.
Old 07-19-2002, 01:39 PM  
Reply With Quote
#107  

electric!sheep
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Morlock


go back and read the post I responded to.
Ok, what was his point? And how were you replying to it?
Old 07-19-2002, 01:41 PM electric!sheep is offline  
Reply With Quote
#108  

ass
Asmodeus
 
ass's Avatar
 
sheep, you really are digging yourself deeper in your lies and misstated facts... the percentage of homosexuality in the US and the world is 1% - 3%... the kinsey study that claimed 10% has been discredited and your use of 12% is just ...

studies in australia sampling roughly 14,000 sets of twins shows that 38% of one set of the twins was gay, considering that the homosexual argument is that homosexuality is genetic rather than a choice, that very same study showed that the corresponding twin was not homosexual at all... if they share identical genetics, then shouldn't they be both homosexual...?

foolish emotional arguments are always the last bastion of the desperate endorsements of deviants who want their behaviors normalized...

Quote:
Originally posted by electric!sheep


What makes you think that he's a homosexual? In any case, the absence of homosexuality would be deviant, since there is a baseline percentage (12%, I think) of people *around the world* who are homosexual. Further, humans are inherently variable, and hence to not see homosexuals in the spectrum of human sexuality would be indeed aberrant.
__________________
RIP...
Old 07-19-2002, 01:57 PM ass is offline  
Reply With Quote
#109  

Morlock
 
Quote:
Originally posted by electric!sheep


Ok, what was his point? And how were you replying to it?
He was asking how scoring so much sex could be considered bad.

for a group that is a minority to have over 50% of the cases of a comunicable disease due to behavior would indicate the behavior is hazardous

hazardous=bad
Old 07-19-2002, 01:57 PM  
Reply With Quote
#110  

ass
Asmodeus
 
ass's Avatar
 
first of all i'm not your son... second of all, i could care less if you are either a heterosexual, homosexual, or bi-sexual, the evidence is fairly clear on this matter and the more you try to deny it, the worse you look... since you are defending or at least devilishly advocating behavior that is contrary to what the rest of the world deems normal, then i'm confused why you fight against facts that are in evidence...

Quote:
Originally posted by steal


false accusations arent needed on this forum, son

i'm not a homosexual, but you are just SO knowledable about the subject, i'm starting to wonder (and i bet im not the only one)
__________________
RIP...
Old 07-19-2002, 02:00 PM ass is offline  
Reply With Quote
#111  

ass
Asmodeus
 
ass's Avatar
 
then you are missing the context by which the deviance is occuring... since mutation is the driving force of evolution then it must be assumed and observed, as well, that said mutation is occuring within the vastly larger heterosexual population...

like i said before, if homosexuality is genetic, then it is a disability created by a bad mutation of genetic order...

Quote:
Originally posted by electric!sheep
Incidentally, how is deviating from the standard bad? Without deviance, evolution would stop.
__________________
RIP...
Old 07-19-2002, 02:03 PM ass is offline  
Reply With Quote
#112  

ass
Asmodeus
 
ass's Avatar
 
hahaha, this is a laugh and a half, so now you are saying that there are sexually oriented diseases as well...? you really are off the deep end...

Quote:
Originally posted by electric!sheep


Not when you have heterosexuals promoting the development of drug-resistant strains. Besides, you're not just dealing with syphilis, but a range of other diseases that, I believe, afflict primarily heterosexuals.
__________________
RIP...
Old 07-19-2002, 02:05 PM ass is offline  
Reply With Quote
#113  

ass
Asmodeus
 
ass's Avatar
 
like...? statistics are not science... and this is not a scientific debate...

Quote:
Originally posted by Greatbear


Typical boilerplate text that comes originally from conservative, anti-gay 'research' funded by the likes of the Family Research Council and other such political groups. Note political , most of this is soundly trounced by objective SCIENTIFIC organizations.

Try a bit harder next time.
__________________
RIP...
Old 07-19-2002, 02:07 PM ass is offline  
Reply With Quote
#114  

electric!sheep
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Asmodeus
sheep, you really are digging yourself deeper in your lies and misstated facts... the percentage of homosexuality in the US and the world is 1% - 3%... the kinsey study that claimed 10% has been discredited and your use of 12% is just ...
Do you have a reference? The percentage was just what I recalled from a textbook.

Quote:
studies in australia sampling roughly 14,000 sets of twins shows that 38% of one set of the twins was gay, considering that the homosexual argument is that homosexuality is genetic rather than a choice, that very same study showed that the corresponding twin was not homosexual at all... if they share identical genetics, then shouldn't they be both homosexual...?
No, of course not. There is no single "gay gene," but there is most likely a number of genes that influence sexuality.
Old 07-19-2002, 02:07 PM electric!sheep is offline  
Reply With Quote
#115  

electric!sheep
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Asmodeus
hahaha, this is a laugh and a half, so now you are saying that there are sexually oriented diseases as well...? you really are off the deep end...
If HIV can affect a disproportionate number of homosexuals, then why would it be impossible that other diseases would be spread primarily through heterosexual means (prostitution, for instance)?
Old 07-19-2002, 02:09 PM electric!sheep is offline  
Reply With Quote
#116  

electric!sheep
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Asmodeus
then you are missing the context by which the deviance is occuring... since mutation is the driving force of evolution then it must be assumed and observed, as well, that said mutation is occuring within the vastly larger heterosexual population...
So?

Quote:
like i said before, if homosexuality is genetic, then it is a disability created by a bad mutation of genetic order...
Except in cases of clear physical incapacitation, only time can judge what is a disability. Bonobo chimps, for instance, are surviving quite well and they almost constantly engage in a number of "deviant" sexual practices.
Old 07-19-2002, 02:12 PM electric!sheep is offline  
Reply With Quote
#117  

BigToof
 


To eats his own!
__________________
Teh Smiley Fagort... :D
Old 07-19-2002, 02:13 PM BigToof is offline  
Reply With Quote
#118  

IMFlacid
marter
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Greatbear


Jennipher totally rawks, whether on the [H] or the [M].

Anyway, most people inherit their religion from their parents, and take it mostly fact, and many not challenging or accepting alternatives, at least not till their teens. The point is, if people take what is written in the bible as immutable law, and use this against a person or people, they should make sure than they take everything else as being law and make sure it all applies to them. I can guarantee, no one does.

As for your own faith, really it is only you who can find out. Be prepared to have plenty of options dangled in front of you by all sides, each one telling you the other is wrong. It is human nature to ultimately know what is true or false, and you will have many doubts.
yep i find myself, with the doubting and stuff, it was actaully taking to alot of people, that i started to doubt what i belived <thought i belived>

born not really chocing a religon, just both my parents were christians. i just went along with em. then they stopped going to church and stuff. so i kinda starting questing it all.
Old 07-19-2002, 02:14 PM IMFlacid is offline  
Reply With Quote
#119  

Morlock
 
Quote:
Originally posted by electric!sheep


If HIV can affect a disproportionate number of homosexuals, then why would it be impossible that other diseases would be spread primarily through heterosexual means (prostitution, for instance)?
Primarily?

Why are you under the impression that homosexuals don't get all the standard std's?

they do. its one of the treatment poblems mentioned by HIV treatment specialists.

Of course a prostitute is going to have the same risks. They are one of the primary vectors of HIV to heterosexual males.
Old 07-19-2002, 02:15 PM  
Reply With Quote
#120  

Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:42 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.