Genmay wikipedia entry deleted :(

[DPhrag]

Originally Posted by that saxifrage page

On behalf of Gen[m]ay. Go eat a dick Saxifrage! BaconCountyRebel 07:30, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

@ whoever that was hahaha

edit: im still laughing at this.. so elegant in it's simplicity

[TriaD]

Originally Posted by Jester

What are you talking about? You can edit walken's wiki.

We have to have a notible link or source on genmays page.
.

[Jester]

Originally Posted by TriaD

We have to have a notible link or source on genmays page.
.

http://www.genmay.net/showthread.php?t=562197

[dickzero]

some fag took kidhero on wikipedia. wtf

[Misutiku]

Originally Posted by DPhrag

@ whoever that was hahaha

edit: im still laughing at this.. so elegant in it's simplicity

07:32, 14 November 2006 Saxifrage (Talk | contribs) blocked "BaconCountyRebel (contribs)" with an expiry time of 24 hours (extreme incivility [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?...rage&diff=cur])

[cockholster]

no assertion of importance

[gg next]

Rizla is the man

[TriaD]

Originally Posted by Jester

http://www.genmay.net/showthread.php?t=562197

Let me explain this, Saxifrage deleted genmays page for not being notable enough. Someone recreated the page, and Saxifrage again deleted and put a block on all further creation of genmays article.
So we can not edit genmays wikipedia article to bring it up to standards, it has to go through the deletion review before anything can happen.

Originally Posted by DPhrag

@ whoever that was hahaha

edit: im still laughing at this.. so elegant in it's simplicity

He gave me a gift for my comment.
What a gdamn baby.

You've been blocked for extreme incivility[1]. This block will expire in 24 hours and you are welcome to contribute constructively when you return. In the meantime, you might consider reading Wikipedia:Civility and Wikipedia:No personal attacks. — Saxifrage ✎ 07:34, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

[DPhrag]

Originally Posted by TriaD

He gave me a gift for my comment.
What a gdamn baby.

You've been blocked for extreme incivility[1]. This block will expire in 24 hours and you are welcome to contribute constructively when you return. In the meantime, you might consider reading Wikipedia:Civility and Wikipedia:No personal attacks. — Saxifrage ✎ 07:34, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

//what a OMGOMGOMGOMG..

Go eat a dick Saxifrage!

[SnarkFish]

Originally Posted by TriaD

Let me explain this, Saxifrage deleted genmays page for not being notable enough. Someone recreated the page, and Saxifrage again deleted and put a block on all further creation of genmays article.
So we can not edit genmays wikipedia article to bring it up to standards, it has to go through the deletion review before anything can happen.

and Jester is suggesting we edit the walken wiki page and add in that Genmay is responsible for the Walken2008.com , therefore making genmay notable on wikipedia itself

edit: oh, see that it was already spelled out above, but the reference should be on the genmay wiki page (which is locked) so kinda hard to do

[TriaD]

Originally Posted by SnarkFish

edit: oh, see that it was already spelled out above, but the reference should be on the genmay wiki page (which is locked) so kinda hard to do

Yes, it does need to be on Genmays article to do us any good.
But the walken page needs to be updated as well.

Someone needs to add
http://genmay.net/showthread.php?t=562197

here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christo...candidacy_hoax

The Urban Legends Reference Pages list the site as a fake [14]. This hoax was perpetrated by the Internet message board General Mayhem.[citation needed]

right were it says citation needed.

[gg next]

-Ditto, present some links or print citations. Just saying there are sources doesn't carry any weight. — Saxifrage ✎ 08:12, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

- http://worldnetdaily.com/news/articl...TICLE_ID=45757
http://news.com.com/2061-11199_3-5833740.html
http://urbanlegends.about.com/b/a/194062.htm
http://digg.com/celebrity/The_origin..._2008_revealed

etc.. etc... etc... Rizla 08:18, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

- Thank you. — Saxifrage ✎ 08:28, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

- Now that I've taken a look through them, I'm going to advise you to turn those "etc" into sources too. All of these talk about the hoax primarily, with General Mayhem getting only a trivial mention as the source of the hoax. That doesn't meet WP:WEB. — Saxifrage ✎ 08:38, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

what a little bitch

[growler]

Originally Posted by gg next

-Ditto, present some links or print citations. Just saying there are sources doesn't carry any weight. — Saxifrage ✎ 08:12, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

- http://worldnetdaily.com/news/articl...TICLE_ID=45757
http://news.com.com/2061-11199_3-5833740.html
http://urbanlegends.about.com/b/a/194062.htm
http://digg.com/celebrity/The_origin..._2008_revealed

etc.. etc... etc... Rizla 08:18, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

- Thank you. — Saxifrage ✎ 08:28, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

- Now that I've taken a look through them, I'm going to advise you to turn those "etc" into sources too. All of these talk about the hoax primarily, with General Mayhem getting only a trivial mention as the source of the hoax. That doesn't meet WP:WEB. — Saxifrage ✎ 08:38, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

what a little bitch

wtf does he want a 10 page article on the hoax with a couple pages on genmay

[dickzero]

why is wikipedia as lame as a class report

[RobCrezz]

We should randomly edit as many pages as possible with:

"SHIT THREAD, LOCK AND B7!"

That would make us fucking notable.