General [M]ayhem

Go Back   General [M]ayhem > Real Time Sub-Forums > The Pit
Register Members List Mark Forums Read [M]erchandise Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools
TheMorlock
Contrary to my previous title I never fucked Inf's mother
 
TheMorlock's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuckyouformakingmeregister View Post
Since the question was "do you think there is warming", your definition of global warming is not relevant. Has there been an increase in temperature on the globe since, say, the beginning of the 20th century?



5 c isn't significant to you?



Since the data does show warming, that statement would be wrong.



While there are, in fact, a number of explanations for why such a thing might happen, I'll wait until you provide the data that proves this claim. I await your patented "do your own research" rebuttal.

POINT 5 c

LEARN TO FUCKING READ

sorry limp dick. the globe as a whole is colder. it's a bit warmer at ground level but colder above major cloud level.
__________________
There is nothing to worry about. Legions of wise people with nothing but all of best interests at heart are ensuring our future of love and infinite bliss. Go watch TV :Bflaps
http://www.genmay.com/showthread.php?t=572323
Old 03-20-2008, 06:01 PM TheMorlock is offline  
Reply With Quote
#61  

Advertisement [Remove Advertisement]

Fuckyouformakingmeregister
wall candy eating retard
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMorlock View Post
well at least you admit you dont know shit about the subject besides what you have been spoonfed

decades old information is not "new"

I am being inflammatory because you dont know shit and repeat all the same crap the gets shot down again and again. and its fun to point and laugh at drool cup wearing tards such as yourself.

Fluctuation are natural. It's possible that we are currently warmer although all solid data says othewise. A warming TREND at this time is not supported by any even mildly rigorous examination of fact. To attribute co2 to this not yet determined temp increase when Real science shows it lags temp increase and the FACT that once a-fucking-gain co2 increase happens long after the globe starts cooling indicates it has no noticible effect and GASP that man made increace in co2 GASP is not going to have more effect than a 1000 fold previous increase in co2 WHILE THE GLOBE WAS COOLING.

learn to fucking read

You can pretend to "know" all you want but until you actually show me evidence of your claims you're just blowing hot air.
Old 03-20-2008, 06:02 PM Fuckyouformakingmeregister is offline  
Reply With Quote
#62  

Fuckyouformakingmeregister
wall candy eating retard
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMorlock View Post
POINT 5 c

LEARN TO FUCKING READ

Why would you write point 5 c instead of 0.5 C?
Old 03-20-2008, 06:03 PM Fuckyouformakingmeregister is offline  
Reply With Quote
#63  

TheMorlock
Contrary to my previous title I never fucked Inf's mother
 
TheMorlock's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuckyouformakingmeregister View Post
Why would you write point 5 c instead of 0.5 C?

because it confuses idiots like you that Cant Fucking Read?

and that are too fucking braindead to realize that a 5 C rise would be a major increase and iw what was predicted to happen by 1985?
__________________
There is nothing to worry about. Legions of wise people with nothing but all of best interests at heart are ensuring our future of love and infinite bliss. Go watch TV :Bflaps
http://www.genmay.com/showthread.php?t=572323
Old 03-20-2008, 06:06 PM TheMorlock is offline  
Reply With Quote
#64  

TheMorlock
Contrary to my previous title I never fucked Inf's mother
 
TheMorlock's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuckyouformakingmeregister View Post
I'm looking for my drool cup. Have you seen it?
__________________
There is nothing to worry about. Legions of wise people with nothing but all of best interests at heart are ensuring our future of love and infinite bliss. Go watch TV :Bflaps
http://www.genmay.com/showthread.php?t=572323
Old 03-20-2008, 06:09 PM TheMorlock is offline  
Reply With Quote
#65  

Fuckyouformakingmeregister
wall candy eating retard
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMorlock View Post
because it confuses idiots like you that Cant Fucking Read?

and that are too fucking braindead to realize that a 5 C rise would be a major increase and iw what was predicted to happen by 1985?

Why would I want to do anything other than scan your posts when you insert random insults and provide no data?
Old 03-20-2008, 06:54 PM Fuckyouformakingmeregister is offline  
Reply With Quote
#66  

TheMorlock
Contrary to my previous title I never fucked Inf's mother
 
TheMorlock's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuckyouformakingmeregister View Post
Why would I want to do anything other than scan your posts when you insert random insults and provide no data?

so you cant read because I did not teach you what words meant?


Gluons say you dnot know shit(heheh)
__________________
There is nothing to worry about. Legions of wise people with nothing but all of best interests at heart are ensuring our future of love and infinite bliss. Go watch TV :Bflaps
http://www.genmay.com/showthread.php?t=572323

Last edited by TheMorlock; 03-20-2008 at 07:25 PM..
Old 03-20-2008, 07:01 PM TheMorlock is offline  
Reply With Quote
#67  

TheMorlock
Contrary to my previous title I never fucked Inf's mother
 
TheMorlock's Avatar
 
where did my new playtoy go?

I have a question. Are we warmer now than we were 50 years ago?point 50 cal sighted in

do you know what partial pressure is?

Vapor pressure?

your ass from a hole in the ground?
__________________
There is nothing to worry about. Legions of wise people with nothing but all of best interests at heart are ensuring our future of love and infinite bliss. Go watch TV :Bflaps
http://www.genmay.com/showthread.php?t=572323

Last edited by TheMorlock; 03-20-2008 at 07:38 PM..
Old 03-20-2008, 07:32 PM TheMorlock is offline  
Reply With Quote
#68  

TheMorlock
Contrary to my previous title I never fucked Inf's mother
 
TheMorlock's Avatar
 
Little teaser for my new bitch

"Below is the letter written to Jeff Severinghaus, and his response:


Dear Jeff,

I read your article "What does the lag of CO2 behind temperature in ice cores tell us about global warming?" You mention that CO2 does not initiate warmings, but may amplify warmings that are already underway. The obvious question comes up as to whether or not CO2 levels also lag periods when cooling begins after a warming cycle…even one of 5,000 years?

If CO2 levels on planet Earth also lag the cooling periods, then how can it be that CO2 levels are causally related to terrestrial heating periods at all? I am not sure what the ice core records are related the time response of CO2 to the cooling trends. If there is also a lag in CO2 levels behind a cooling period, then it appears that CO2 levels not only do not initiate warming periods but are also unrelated to the onset of cooling periods. It would appear that the actual CO2 levels are rather impotent as an amplifier either way…warming or cooling. We are talking about planet Earth after all and not Venus whose atmospheric pressure is many times larger than Earth's.

If there is also a time lag upon the onset of cooling, then it appears that some other mechanism actually drives the temperature changes. So what is the time difference between CO2 levels during the onset of a cooling period at the end of a warming period and the time history of the temperature changes in the ice cores?

Dear John,

The coolings appear to be caused primarily and initially by increase in the Earth-Sun distance during northern hemisphere summer, (that would be insolation limpdick)due to changes in the Earth's orbit. As the orbit is not round, but elliptical, sunshine is weaker during some parts of the year than others. This is the so-called Milankovitch hypothesis [this really should say "theory" — eric], which you may have heard about. Just as in the warmings, CO2 lags the coolings by a thousand years or so, in some cases as much as three thousand years.

But do not make the mistake of assuming that these warmings and coolings must have a single cause. It is well known that multiple factors are involved, including the change in planetary albedo, change in nitrous oxide concentration, change in methane concentration, and change in CO2 concentration. I know it is intellectually satisfying to identify a single cause for some observed phenomenon, but that unfortunately is not the way Nature works much of the time.(but is the way that global warming junk science operates)

Nor is there any requirement that a single cause operate throughout the entire 5000 - year long warming trends, and the 70,000 year cooling trends.

Thus it is not logical to argue that, because CO2 does not cause the first thousand years or so of warming, nor the first thousand years of cooling, it cannot have caused part of the many thousands of years of warming in between."
__________________
There is nothing to worry about. Legions of wise people with nothing but all of best interests at heart are ensuring our future of love and infinite bliss. Go watch TV :Bflaps
http://www.genmay.com/showthread.php?t=572323

Last edited by TheMorlock; 03-20-2008 at 08:25 PM..
Old 03-20-2008, 08:10 PM TheMorlock is offline  
Reply With Quote
#69  

MC
 
MC's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuckyouformakingmeregister View Post
Temperatures dropping in 1 year (even 5 years) doesn't disprove global warming. It's the long term trends, not the short term variations that are important. Like this:


Source: http://www.ipcc.ch/graphics/gr-ar4-wg1.htm

I'm sure if you morons had been around in the early 1980s during the brief dip you'd all be saying the same shit. And you'd have been wrong.
I dont get how a huge dip during the 80s proves Global warming..... shouldnt it be the opposite?

I mean how can air pollution pick and choose which decades it wants to affect
Old 03-20-2008, 09:49 PM MC is offline  
Reply With Quote
#70  

TheMorlock
Contrary to my previous title I never fucked Inf's mother
 
TheMorlock's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by MC View Post
I dont get how a huge dip during the 80s proves Global warming..... shouldnt it be the opposite?

I mean how can air pollution pick and choose which decades it wants to affect

well you see the reason that global warming greenhouse gases did not have the semi exponential effect claimed is due to global dimming from the same pollution that emits said gases. black soot partiulates in the atomosphere somehow increased the earths albedo and totally and exactly offset the expected global warming. (that was the REAL explanation from the junk science crowd. however - the heavy sarcasm

So according to junk science Pollution is GOOD
__________________
There is nothing to worry about. Legions of wise people with nothing but all of best interests at heart are ensuring our future of love and infinite bliss. Go watch TV :Bflaps
http://www.genmay.com/showthread.php?t=572323
Old 03-20-2008, 09:59 PM TheMorlock is offline  
Reply With Quote
#71  

Fuckyouformakingmeregister
wall candy eating retard
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMorlock View Post
where did my new playtoy go?

I have a question. Are we warmer now than we were 50 years ago?point 50 cal sighted in

do you know what partial pressure is?

Vapor pressure?

your ass from a hole in the ground?

Yes.

I funny it amusing you bitch at Postal and others when THEY support people who go against the vast majority of experts while at the same time opposing the vast majority of climatologists on this issue. Why, for instance, did you trust the many engineers who studied the world trade center collapse but not the many scientists who have disproved every explanation for warming other than CO2?
Old 03-20-2008, 10:36 PM Fuckyouformakingmeregister is offline  
Reply With Quote
#72  

Fuckyouformakingmeregister
wall candy eating retard
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by MC View Post
I dont get how a huge dip during the 80s proves Global warming..... shouldnt it be the opposite?

I mean how can air pollution pick and choose which decades it wants to affect

You guys need to stop putting words in my mouth.

That particular graph was a response to the original claim by the OP that the earth has not experienced any recent warming.

I have, later, taken the position that CO2 is a likely candidate as a cause and you're more than welcome to refute what I've said or provide evidence to the contrary.
Old 03-20-2008, 10:41 PM Fuckyouformakingmeregister is offline  
Reply With Quote
#73  

TheMorlock
Contrary to my previous title I never fucked Inf's mother
 
TheMorlock's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuckyouformakingmeregister View Post
Yes.

I funny it amusing you bitch at Postal and others when THEY support people who go against the vast majority of experts while at the same time opposing the vast majority of climatologists on this issue. Why, for instance, did you trust the many engineers who studied the world trade center collapse but not the many scientists who have disproved every explanation for warming other than CO2?

as my new bitch you are championing Postal??
Sorry ass bandit, the majority of CLIMATE specialists says global warming is not supported.

The lead man for the IPCC 1 0r 2 report resigned in protest when the POLITICIANS claimed it was proof of man made warming

but I ask once again. have we increased in temps since 1950?
yes or no( you seemed to like that format earlier)
__________________
There is nothing to worry about. Legions of wise people with nothing but all of best interests at heart are ensuring our future of love and infinite bliss. Go watch TV :Bflaps
http://www.genmay.com/showthread.php?t=572323
Old 03-20-2008, 10:45 PM TheMorlock is offline  
Reply With Quote
#74  

TheMorlock
Contrary to my previous title I never fucked Inf's mother
 
TheMorlock's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuckyouformakingmeregister View Post
You guys need to stop putting words in my mouth.

That particular graph was a response to the original claim by the OP that the earth has not experienced any recent warming.

I have, later, taken the position that CO2 is a likely candidate as a cause and you're more than welcome to refute what I've said or provide evidence to the contrary.

you need stop talking shit about a subject you dont know a fucking thing about

bitch

As far as your other crap where you try to pump up Postal goatchode. you fucking imbecile(you must be postal goat chode) Postal goatchode got raped by REAL science. its called physics. and when you know all th inputs to an equation there is not much room for FUCKNUTS LIKE YOU
paging TOM Z postals dupe nees raped again
__________________
There is nothing to worry about. Legions of wise people with nothing but all of best interests at heart are ensuring our future of love and infinite bliss. Go watch TV :Bflaps
http://www.genmay.com/showthread.php?t=572323

Last edited by TheMorlock; 03-20-2008 at 10:55 PM..
Old 03-20-2008, 10:45 PM TheMorlock is offline  
Reply With Quote
#75  

Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:20 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.