Link: Copy link
Only in The Pit is someone called a dumbass for linking to what is now twenty articles that prove my point of view. Let's just focus for a second, you are calling me a dumbass because you and I have different opinions on this subject. What the fuck is that about?dagamore wrote:not to call you a dumb ass but you are a great big dumb ass.
Now i can not link to any articles that "support" my point of view...
Fixed for truth.Dyno wrote:I'll just keep bring out more Daily Show and liberal blogs that paint what kind of a hell that country has become. ...........
The United States was probably a bad place to be a british loyalist after the french came in and helped the Colonists fight off their oppressors, too.Dyno wrote:I'll just keep bring out more article that paint what kind of a hell that country has become. Arthur and Badger and the rest can make their pathetic shots meanwhile come up with nothing that paints a better picture.
Think about this you delusional pap-smears. When America rolls in to a country to fight the War on Terror, why does that country become the first nation in the world to offer Terror Attack Insurance? Iraq has become the most terrorised country on earth because the US went there to combat terror. Talk about a total fucking failure! We're talking 180 degrees.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/21/inter ... ?th&emc=th
I can't even fathom living in a place where such insanity becomes the norm.
You just proved his point you stupid piece of shit, the oppourtunity wasn't there before, since the US arrived, terror insurance is now a viable market, good job proving his fucking point.Badger_sly wrote:Fixed for truth.
The best latest spin of you can come up with Dyno is insurance?
Insurance companies taking benefit from any given opportunity........who'd a thought???
Your attempts at spin just keep getting increasingly weak.
Yeah all Badger has are accusations that I get all my info from The Daily Show, meanwhile the last twelve links or so have come from The New York Times or the Guardian or Yahoo.cartz wrote:You just proved his point you stupid piece of shit, the oppourtunity wasn't there before, since the US arrived, terror insurance is now a viable market, good job proving his fucking point.
Dyno wrote:Yeah all Badger has are accusations that I get all my info from The Daily Show, meanwhile the last twelve links or so have come from The New York Times or the Guardian or Yahoo.
He also can't differenciate between actual footage of an event or statement and the site that hosts it. I doubt very much that he's allowed to drive or work with power tools either.
For the sake of argument I would agree and so I am loath to attack the source of information, rather I look for another source that either confirms or contradicts the original source.Impulse Rxn wrote:The fact is is that almost every news organisation has some kind of bias to it, it's almost inescapable. Even the neutrality of the Associated press has recently come into question. Although one can comment on the illegitimate source of ones arguments, it's tough to come up with a better source becasue almost all of them are going to be biased. Even many 'non partisan' organisations has party ties if you look hard enough
You have to understand that you're debasing what would be an otherwise sound response by throwing in your condescending 'factless neocon hack' tirade. For every 'factless neocon hack' tired there's a 'bleeding heart socialist' CNN article that 'chooses' to leave out key facts that are printed elsewhere.Dyno wrote:For the sake of argument I would agree and so I am loath to attack the source of information, rather I look for another source that either confirms or contradicts the original source.
But the Morlocks, Badgers, Gs, and Dagomores are too lazy for that (which I can appreciate because finding a good news in Iraq story might take all day.) Instead they just pull out the same tired insults and bash the sources I bring. They feel compelled to fill the thread with factless neo-con slant in order to counteract the news reports I find.
I'm confident however that readers of at least average intelligence see these ass-clowns for the vapid mouthpieces they are.
Dyno wrote:Only in The Pit is someone called a dumbass for linking to what is now twenty articles that prove my point of view. Let's just focus for a second, you are calling me a dumbass because you and I have different opinions on this subject. What the fuck is that about?
Since the last report I saw on the make up of the MSM showed that 92% of them were either Registered Democrats, or another left leaning political group. So I do not accept what most of the MSM have to say, now if the MSM was even closely to a proper cross sample of political believes it might make a difference, but since they are for the most part Blatant Partisan Hacks, and I spend all day working with Real US Army Soldiers and they have a vastly different opinion of what is going on in both OEF OIF. and before you get on a high horse about the military being blatantly right wing, the last Stars and Stripes (US Military Over Seas Paper) showed that only 41% think of them self’s as republicans/right wing, and 42% think of them self’s as democrats/left wing.Dyno wrote:Your friends are saying different things than all the major news agencies. Things that you cannot collaborate with any news agency yourself. Remarkable.
I dont buy the 50-60 per day, even if you count civilian casualties in that number, more like 25-30, and yes that ancient mosque did blow up, IED's are an issue, and the attacks are happening, but no in increasing numbers (look at the state.gov and or the army.mil OPI sites). I will tell you what they are saying.Dyno wrote:So are your friends saying that 50-60 are not dying every day that the ancient mosque wasn't blown to pieces that IEDs and other attacks aren't happening in increasing numbers. Just what are they saying that no one else dares report?