Link: Copy link
There is no global cooling here No None at all Since there is not enough data to prove or disprove the fact we should just wait it out.Static Vision wrote:There is no global warming here. No, none at all. Since there is not enough data to prove or disprove the fact we should just wait it out.
LOL LETS NOT BE PROACTIVE
Good counter.TheMorlock wrote:hahhahahah
You are welcome. the least I can do for my new bitch is buy a nice leashFuckyouformakingmeregister wrote:Good counter.
EDIT: Lol, someone actually paid to give me a title? Sweet.
I'll remind you for the 3rd time in this thread, saying you're "beating me" doesn't actually make it true. So far I've handled every "argument" you sent my way.TheMorlock wrote:You are welcome. the least I can do for my new bitch is buy a nice leash
Fuckyouformakingmeregister wrote:I'll remind you for the 3rd time in this thread, saying you're "beating me" doesn't actually make it true. So far I've handled every "argument" you sent my way.
For instance, your argument that the IPCC can't be trusted because one of the guys left and spoke out against the group was totally refuted when I revealed why he left - to refresh your memory, because you seem to be a little slow, he left because he didn't like how people were interpreting the hurricane data NOT because he disagreed with their overall conclusions. But, as usual, you just won't respond to my counter and hope everyone else in the thread doesn't notice.
I should also point out that if I can annoy someone enough that they actually spend real money to give me a barely visible and totally ineffective title, I've won regardless of how the argument goes.
P.S. You should spring for an avatar if you really want to make your point.
OK......Fuckyouformakingmeregister wrote:An analogy, if you will:
Suppose forest fires occur naturally. And let's say people also start forest fires. Let's also pretend for a second that there's also some person out there that knows nothing about the causes of forest fires.
Finally, let's say this disbeliever then looked at a graph showing the occurance of forest fires over a 10 million year period.
Do you think he would have grounds for concluding that humans cannot start forest fires?
The answer, of course, is no. Hopefully you can connect the dots and see how it's relevant to our discussion.
Badger_sly wrote:It does prove that the earth was much warmer in the past before there was any man-made input. Thus, natural climate change fluctuates the earth's temps, not mankind.
My first post on page 3.Fuckyouformakingmeregister wrote:Where?
It does prove that CO2 does not cause man-made global warming.[/quote]I saw your last post and, like I said, it does not disprove global warming is being caused or amplified by CO2.
And cooling, and warming, and cooling, etc. All due to natural climate change.You do seem to believe the earth is warming though, so that's something.
You have to come up with own, new junk science arguements to promote. I've proved you wrong, and now wait for you to try something new.You'll have to come up with a mechanism on your own if you want me take a "new angle".
The point of the analogy was to show how ridiculous your logic is.Badger_sly wrote:OK......
Given your attempted analogy is pretty stupid, and you completely failed to show a correlation, it's obvious you not only suck at analogies, but you're not really trying to disprove what I've proven to you. So we'll chalk it up as you don't have an arguement.